Self Regulation mechanism to be industry
led process
Minister
for Information & Broadcasting, Shri Manish Tewari has said that the
process of mainstreaming self regulation as a statutory mechanism, ought to be
led by the Industry rather than the Government. The Minister emphasised that
the Government’s approach towards the media was an “Essay in Persuasion not
Regulation”. The stakeholders within the industry would have to define the
equilibrium levels so as to ensure that the paradigm of transparency, fairness,
sobriety and avoidance of sensationalism becomes the key driver of the National
discourse in the media space. Shri Tewari stated this while speaking at a panel
discussion on "Media Regulation: Is status quo the option?” here today.
Elaborating
further, the Minister said, digitization as a process could be leveraged to
augment sample sizes by re-engineering every Set Top box to function as a
virtual “People’s Meter”. Out of the box innovation and creative thinking by
Media entrepreneurs could surmount the current challenges by a technological
leap that could transform the dynamics at the back end of the Media
Sector. Industry could then utilise the
data and develop business models that were transparent and workable. This process would ensure an alternative to
the ongoing conflict surrounding TAM / TRP that the Broadcasting industry held
responsible for much of its woes. He emphasised that the way forward was also
to fast track Broadcasting Audience Research Council (BARC) as an industry led
body that would provide a reliable measurement of popular viewership patterns
and help broadcasters overcome corrosive narratives.
During his address, the Minister
also touched upon the growing importance of the New Media space which had
revolutionised the media landscape. The growth of the internet had led to a
situation where there could be a conflict between the physical and virtual
civilization. It was important to comprehend the fact that the power of
expression and dissemination through the internet had added a new dimension to
innovations in information dissemination. While the opening up of the virtual
space had led to democratization of the information paradigm, it had also led
to “Technology becoming a Leveller”. Shri Tewari further added that these
developments could also lead to a situation where one could also face
“Balkanization of the Internet” if agreed rules of international engagement did
not emerge as a binding international compact that encompassed states and other
entities who controlled the underlying hardware. This situation needed to be
avoided at all costs so as to ensure that no artificial divisions are created in
the World Wide Web on ideological entities and Westphalian lines.
The Minister also emphasised on
critical paradoxes within the media space that
would need to be reconciled. These included Proliferation of numerous mediums
of communication as qua a growing intolerance to an opposite viewpoint, Right
to a fair trial qua Trial by the media, Presence of flawed revenue models qua
questionable methods of revenue augmentation, TRP qua the truth and the raging
debate between self regulation and statutory regulation.
2 comments:
THE POLICY OF GOI TOWARDS MEDIA IS VERY WELCOMING AS IT UP HOLDS THE RESPECT OF ‘FREEDOM OF PRESS’ MEDIA BEING IMPORTANT PILLAR IN THE DEMOCRACY AS MANY PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT BECAUSE OF FREEDOM OF PRESS MEDIA ABLE TO EXPOSE CORRUPTION AS SUCH CORRUPTION, CRIME IS UNDER CONTROL.
AS SAID BY I & B MINISTER GOI THAT ‘MEDIA THEMSELVES’ SHOULD FORMULATE A SET OF RULES/REGULATIONS/LIMITS AMONG THEMSELVES TO ADDRESS FEELINGS OF COMMON PEOPLE THROUGH SELF REGULATION IS VERY NEED OF THE HOUR AS MANY COMMON PEOPLE FEEL CORRECTION IS REQUIRED IN THE PRESENT SYSTEM OF WORKING OF MEDIA.
DUE TO EXCESS COMPETITION THE QUALITY OF PRESENTATION IS DEGRADING AND REACHED AN ALARMING LEVEL? THE LACK OF INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM, JUST CUT, COPY AND PASTE THE ‘NEWS’ FROM OTHER STANDARD MEDIA (IN SINGLE DIGIT NUMBERS) IS ON RISE? SOCIAL MEDIA LIKE TWITTER, FACE BOOK BECOMING BASIC SOURCE OF NEWS?
MAKING SENSATION ON PETTY ISSUES/COMMENTS OF SOME INDIVIDUALS MADE IN A REMOTE PLACE TO ATTRACT MORE VIEWER SHIP/POPULARITY WASTING PRECIOUS TIME? EXCESS OF ENTERTAINMENT NEWS/GOSSIPS LIKE THIS ACTRESS IS LIVING WITH THAT ACTOR, THIS MOVE COLLECTED THIS MANY CRORES OF RUPEES ETC ETC WASTING ENERGIES OF YOUTH? ALSO SOME PRINT MEDIA MAJORITY OF NEWS IS GOSSIPS & PHOTOS OF SEMI NUDE FEMALES WITH LESS THAN 20% OF TOTAL PAGES IS NEWS? IN CASE OF ANY AGITATIONS SHOWING DRAGGING OF WOMEN/GIRLS BY POLICE FORCE IN INDECENT POSITIONS? REPEATEDLY SHOWING YOUNG GIRLS CAUGHT IN A PUB DRINKING? IN CASE OF BUSTING PROSTITUTION ROCKETS ONLY GIRLS / WOMEN ARE CHASED TO SHOW UP THEIR FACE?
ALSO MEDIA SOURCING CONFIDENTIAL /CLASSIFIED INFORMATION RELATED TO CORRUPTION OR ANY INFORMATION FROM WHISTLE BLOWERS WHO ARE EMPLOYEES OF GOVT/ANY ORGANISATION, THOSE EMPLOYEES SOURCE INFO THROUGH THEFT/UN AUTHORISED MANNER? ALSO IN CRIMINAL POLICE CUSTODY INTERROGATION THE INVESTIGATION REPORT SUPPOSED TO BE PRODUCED IN COURT ARE BEING AIRED IN MEDIA BEFORE IT IS PRODUCED IN COURT? IF ANY PERSON IN ‘ICU’ IN HOSPITAL WHICH IS RESTRICTED AREA, ACCESS ONLY FOR DOCTORS ON DUTY THEN MEDIA CLAIMING THAT FIRST TIME ON SO AND SO CHANNEL THIS ICU PHOTOGRAPH? IN CASE OF ANY ACCIDENT IF ANY MEDIA CHANNEL REACH IN FEW SECONDS IN ADVANCE THAN OTHER MEDIA MAY BE THROUGH OVER SPEED DRIVING OF THE OB VAN/CAB TO REACH FIRST THE SPOT THEN THEY CLAIM THAT FIRST TIME IN MEDIA OF SUCH SAD INCIDENCES?
SINCE ALMOST EVERY POLITICAL PARTY (REGIONAL) & SOME POLITICAL LEADERS WITH MONEY POWER OWNING MEDIA, IT IS AN OPEN FACT THAT BIASED NEWS IS BEING AIRED/CIRCULATED IN SUCH MEDIA TO GAIN SYMPATHY/POPULARITY OF THAT LEADER/POLITICAL PARTY?
ALSO IN CASE SOME STANDARD NON BIASED MEDIA EXPOSES SOME CORRUPTION ABOUT THE POLITICAL PARTY/ POLITICAL LEADERS OR THEIR KIN WHO ARE OWNERS SOME MEDIA, THEN COMPLETELY IGNORING THE JOURNALISTIC ETHICS THE TAINTED PERSONS MEDIA HOUSE OPENLY CRITICIZES OTHER STANDARD MEDIA ONLY FOR CREATING UTTER CONFUSION TO READERS/VIEWER’S ABOUT TRUTH/FACTS EXPRESSED IN STANDARD MEDIA?
ALSO WHEN BUREAUCRATS & ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES PUBLIC SERVANTS ON OATH, HOW COME THEY ARE ALLOWED TO BE BIASED IN GIVING SO CALLED EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW TO SOME SECTION OF MEDIA?
MANY INTELLECTUALS FEEL THAT MEDIA SHOULD FOCUS MORE TO INFUSE VALUES, MORALS, ETHICS, SOCIAL OBLIGATIONS & SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES IN PEOPLE ESPECIALLY YOUTH? ALSO MEDIA IS CURRENTLY CITY CENTRIC/ URBAN CENTRIC? NEED TO REACH RURAL INDIA? NEED FOR SYNERGISING MEDIA ENERGIES ?
AS SUCH THERE SHOULD BE SOME KIND OF REGULATIONS (MOST IDEAL SELF REGULATION BY MEDIA) TO ENSURE NOBEL PROFESSION OF JOURNALISM COMMANDS RESPECT TO KEEP ON MAINTAINING THE SYSTEMS WORK AS INTENDED LEGITIMATELY AND RIGHTEOUSLY FOR BETTER LIVING OF ALL SECTIONS OF PEOPLE.
JAI HIND
Post a Comment